There has been a great deal of discussion the past few years about the increasing wealth gap and what to do about. Most of the practical solutions involve some aspect of expanding government or developing new government policies to either redistribute wealth or increase pay for employees or some combination of both. No doubt that the wealth gap also leads to a gap in education, job skills, and opportunity. Few politicians, however, are looking behind the wealth gap and asking hard questions. Such as, what explains this gap? Is there something in our society that is contributing to this disparity.
True, there has always been poverty and in fact Jesus stated, “For you always have the poor with you; but you do not always have Me.” (Matthew 26:11, NASB95). Poverty will be a part of the human condition until the consummation of creation and the establishing of the new heaven and earth. Does this mean we should ignore it? Of course not! For the bible commands us as children of God to care for one another. But this does not mean that we should be in favor of every policy that comes down from Washington, especially if those policies do not address the heart of the matter, or at least a major contributing factor.
While politicians have been ignoring the underlying cause, some sociologists and many clergy have not. Two recent books I have read went straight to the heart of the matter: Home Economics: the Consequences of Changing Family Structure, Nick Schulz; and From Family Collapse to America’s Decline, by Mitch Pearlson. Both works were highly informative and yet frightening at the same time. The good news is the answer to our poverty and education gap is staring us right in the face. The bad news is, the numbers are getting worse and nobody at a policy level is talking about the real problem. What is the real problem? The breakdown and collapse of the traditional or nuclear family has been devastating on family income and education. The numbers are clear, children who are raised apart from their biological Father and Mother, either as a result of a divorce or out of wedlock birth, are at much greater risk for poverty and all of its effects. Many single-parent households struggle financially and this affects the neighborhood and social community that the child inhabits. Often, the schools they attend will be sub-par due to a low financial base.
But perhaps more striking was the fact that children in single-parent households with a middle-class or upper-middle class income do not fare much better. In fact, Pearlson was quite surprised to find that children from upper income single-parent homes and children in a home with a step-parent were closer, statistic wise, to the low income single-parent household then the child with both biological parents. The reason why is partly due to what Schulz refers to as; social capital. Children who are raised by their biological parents develop social capital. This includes a sense of security, commitment, hard-work, trust, and self-identity. Social capital is critical to developing economic capital. Social capital is also crucial to doing well in school.
All of this affirms the biblical pattern for marriage and family. It seems as though God really did know what He was doing when he designed man for woman and woman for man, the two coming together to become one-flesh with the product of that one-flesh union being the children. Even further, that one-flesh union is to be forever. This is not only what is best for the children, but for the individual in the one-flesh union as well. “And He answered and said, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, and said, ‘FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH’? “So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.”(Matthew 19:4–6, NASB95)